Back
/
test10Copyright not evaluated
string(23) "Copyright not evaluated"
array(4) {
  ["txt"]=>
  string(23) "Copyright not evaluated"
  ["block_datas"]=>
  string(0) ""
  ["block_thumbnail"]=>
  string(0) ""
  ["block_media"]=>
  string(1) "1"
}
You are not logged in

Gender and judging

CreatorSchultz, Ulrike > (ed.)
Shaw, Gisela > (ed.)
Contributor[et al.]
SeriesOnati International Series in Law and Society
Publish PlaceOxford
PublisherHart
Publish Year2013
PagesXXXIII, 606p.
ISBN/ISSN9781841136400
LanguageEnglish/Engels
Shelfmark
WER 8 2013 - B
Mediumboek
FormatB
DescriptionDoes gender make a difference to the way the judiciary works and should work? Or, is gender blindness a built-in prerequisite of judicial objectivity? If gender does make a difference, how might this be defined? These are the key questions posed in this collection of essays. The book's pressing topicality is underlined by the fact that male opposition to women's admission to, and progress within, the judicial profession has been largely based on the argument that, because of their gender, women are naturally programmed to show empathy, partiality, and gendered prejudice - in short, essential qualities running directly counter to the need for judicial bjectivity. There remains a more or less pronounced glass ceiling to women's judicial careers.
Thesaurusjuridische beroepen
loopbanen
glazen plafond
rechtspraak
pioniers
feminisme
quota
diversiteit
seksualiteit
etniciteit
Verenigde Staten
Verenigd Koninkrijk
Duitsland
Frankrijk
Kenia
Zwitserland
Nederland
Ivoorkust
India
Japan
Filipijnen
Cambodja
bundel
CategoriesBook/Boek


Similar documents