Een twintigtal Nederlandse en Vlaamse auteurs – waaronder Doreen Gerritzen, Marita Mathijsen, Lotte van der Pol, Arianne Baggerman, Hugo Röling, Dienke Hondius, Ineke van Beek, Annemarieke Willemsen, Hester Dibbits, Frauke Laarmann, Heidi de Mare e.v.a. – laat zien langs welke wegen en aan de hand van welke bronnen historici de geschiedenis van het persoonlijk leven in kaart kunnen brengen. Door een chronologische spreiding van onderwerpen ontstaat een overzicht van de geschiedenis van huishouden, huwelijk en gezin. Deze uitgave is tevens tekstboek bij de gelijknamige cursus, aan de Faculteit Cultuurwetenschappen, Open Universiteit Nederland.
First published in 2007. First paperback edition published in 2011. Abortion in the Weimar Republic (1918/1919-1933) is a compelling subject since it provoked public debates and campaigns of an intensity rarely matched elsewhere. It proved so explosive because populationist, ecclesiastical and political concerns were heightened by cultural anxieties of a modernity in crisis. Based on an rich source material (e.g., criminal court cases, doctors' case books, personal diaries, feature films, plays and literary works), this study explores different attitudes and experiences of those women who sought to terminate an unwanted pregnancy and those who helped or hindered them. It analyzes the dichotomy between medical theory and practice, and questions common assumptions, i.e. that abortion was 'a necessary evil,' which needed strict regulation and medical control: or that all back-street abortions were dangerous and bad. Above all, the book reveals women's own voices, frequently contradictory and ambiguous: having internalized medical ideas they often also adhered to older notions of reproduction which opposed scientific approaches.